mega888 apk Agreement With Passive Voice | gusdog

Main menu:

September 2021
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories

Agreement With Passive Voice

In the active voice, the subject is the rich of the plot expressed in the verb: sentences written in an active voice are usually clearer and more effective than sentences written in passive voice. This does not mean, however, that we should always avoid the passive voice. MSCD 2.18 provides an example of the appropriate use of passive voice when a necessary project authorization is withdrawn. If different organizations could revoke a permission, it would be counterproductive to insist on the Active Voice version if someone revokes a necessary project permission. Nominalization. Nouns are harder to read than verbs. “Active phrases” tend to set up “obsessive” structures that would be covered with nouns in the passive. A verb gives effect to a sentence, while a noun puts the reader out of context. This means that a text becomes more alive even in the active voice. Not only does the active voice keep a sentence simpler, but it tends to make the sentence clearer. Lawyers are well placed to nominalize verbs: in the eyes of the lawyer, a shareholder does not decide, but makes or makes a resolution; a buyer does not pay, but makes a payment; a party shall not inform therewith in writing, but shall inform therewith in writing; a service provider does not act appropriately, but takes appropriate measures.

NO! Try to avoid these nounizations and build as much as possible on verbs. A form of active time. A golden rule for writing texts, as valuable in the design of contracts as for any text, is to use the active form of time instead of passive time. Often, the active voice leads to a less eloquent and more direct sentence. In passive time, there is a potential risk of not knowing which party is required to provide benefits. To solve this problem in the liability, the author must insert additional words as by the seller. Two more words. One technique to prevent this is to recognize that any obligation should mention the debtor. In most cases, the rate is thus almost automatically converted into an active form of time, in which the debtor of an obligation is also the subject (grammatically) of the sentence.

. . .